Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
We inform. You decide.
Monday, October 18, 2021

Supreme Court denies NCAA in unanimous ruling

All nine judges vote to allow remove limit from educational benefits for student-athletes

In this Nov. 5, 2020 file photo, The Supreme Court is seen in Washington. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
In this Nov. 5, 2020 file photo, The Supreme Court is seen in Washington. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

In what’s already been a landmark summer for student-athlete compensation with the impending name, image and likeness bill, the National College Athletic Association (NCAA) lost a Supreme Court case on June 21, establishing education-related payments for collegiate players.

The Supreme Court voted unanimously against the NCAA in the NCAA v. Alston case to allow student-athletes to receive education-related payments beyond tuition and room and board. The court declared the organization’s cap on educational benefits violated federal antitrust laws.

With the cap removed, colleges can now begin to entice prospective and current student-athletes with funding for things like study abroad trips, internships, computers and materials, graduate degrees and tutoring with no financial limit. The decision and ruling were entirely unrelated to the idea of player salaries and pay-for-play rules involving economic rewards for athletic performance.

The NCAA acted as if it was above the law and its business model would be illegal in any other American industry, Justice Brett Kavanagh wrote in his concurring opinion.

“Nowhere else in America can businesses get away with agreeing not to pay their workers a fair market rate on the theory that their product is defined by not paying their workers a fair market rate,” Kavanagh wrote.

Drew Butler, a former collegiate and NFL punter and current executive vice president of the collegiate division at Icon Source, said he was amazed the ruling was unanimous.

“I think that (unanimous ruling) just goes to show just how egregious some of the practices have been in regards to limiting the education-related benefits for student-athletes,” Butler said.

The hearing for the case was held on March 31, where NCAA attorney Seth Waxman argued maintaining the amateurism of college athletes differentiated the NCAA from professional sports and preserved tradition. The justices peppered Waxman in a display which gave Butler confidence about the direction of the ruling.

“If you watched the hearings and you heard just how passionate some of these justices were, the questions that they were asking the NCAA, you kind of got the sense that was how this was going to shake out and I’m glad it is,” Butler said.

The fact both the name, image & likeness bill and this Supreme Court ruling came in the same year, or even in the same two weeks, isn’t lost on Butler.

“2021 is the year of the college athlete,” Butler said.

Contact Ryan Haley at Follow him on Twitter @ryan_dhaley.

Enjoy what you're reading? Get content from The Alligator delivered to your inbox
Support your local paper
Donate Today
The Independent Florida Alligator has been independent of the university since 1971, your donation today could help #SaveStudentNewsrooms. Please consider giving today.

Ryan Haley

Ryan Haley is a second-year journalism major with a sports & media specialization from Jacksonville, Florida. He grew up playing a bunch of different sports before settling on golf, following Rory McIlroy and all Philadelphia sports teams. He also loves all things fiction, reading, watching shows and movies and talking about whatever current story or character is in his head.

Powered by SNworks Solutions by The State News
All Content © 2021 The Independent Florida Alligator and Campus Communications, Inc.